In the Margins
In a recent opinion piece, Washington, D.C., lawyer Eugene Scalia recounts his role in challenging a Securities and Exchange Commission rule concerning the extent to which mutual fund directors should be required to be independent of the advisory firm that manages the fund. In it, he examines the role of cost-benefit analysis and reasoned decision-making—or, in this case, the lack thereof. Read the original piece in The Regulatory Review.
Most Read
Mutual fund independent directors earned more in 2024 than in the year prior, and the pace at which their compensation grew was also higher year-on-year, according ...
The two longest-serving independent directors of ASA Gold and Precious Metals Ltd. have resigned from the board, and all litigation pursued by activist investor Saba Capital ...
Fund Board Views has refreshed and expanded its Editorial Think Tank ahead of its 10-year anniversary this fall. The nine members will continue to work closely with ...
The Securities and Exchange Commission last week dismissed charges against the defendants in the first-ever case related to enforcement of the liquidity risk management rule adopted ...