In the Margins
In a recent opinion piece, Washington, D.C., lawyer Eugene Scalia recounts his role in challenging a Securities and Exchange Commission rule concerning the extent to which mutual fund directors should be required to be independent of the advisory firm that manages the fund. In it, he examines the role of cost-benefit analysis and reasoned decision-making—or, in this case, the lack thereof. Read the original piece in The Regulatory Review.
Most Read
The Securities and Exchange Commission seems poised to grant exemptive relief to one of the earliest applicants seeking to offer an exchange-traded fund share class, just ...
The Investment Company Institute this week made public a set of recommendations to reform and modernize the Investment Company Act of 1940, which has not been ...
Securities brokerage firms are a critical part of the financial landscape, as they provide a vast array of products and services to the financial services industry, ...
The percentage of female independent directors serving on mutual fund boards has increased impressively in recent years, jumping from about 20% 10 years ago to nearly 40% ...