In the Margins
In a recent opinion piece, Washington, D.C., lawyer Eugene Scalia recounts his role in challenging a Securities and Exchange Commission rule concerning the extent to which mutual fund directors should be required to be independent of the advisory firm that manages the fund. In it, he examines the role of cost-benefit analysis and reasoned decision-making—or, in this case, the lack thereof. Read the original piece in The Regulatory Review.
Most Read
Mutual fund boardrooms are more diverse than ever, with the percentage of women and individuals representing a racial or ethnic minority group increasing annually—and at a ...
Independent mutual fund directors earned more in 2022 than they did in 2021, according to industry data obtained by Fund Board Views. The year-on-year increase—a median of ...
Jay Baris, a partner in the Investment Funds group at Sidley Austin, has gotten into podcasting. The '40 Act lawyer is not just a podcast enthusiast, ...
The Securities and Exchange Commission's move away from swing pricing in the money market fund rule finalized last week was welcomed by the fund board community, ...