In the Margins
In a recent opinion piece, Washington, D.C., lawyer Eugene Scalia recounts his role in challenging a Securities and Exchange Commission rule concerning the extent to which mutual fund directors should be required to be independent of the advisory firm that manages the fund. In it, he examines the role of cost-benefit analysis and reasoned decision-making—or, in this case, the lack thereof. Read the original piece in The Regulatory Review.
Most Read
The Securities and Exchange Commission has been accused of "over-regulation" in recent years as it has proposed and finalized dozens of rules in a relatively short ...
It's the Summer Solstice, and that means that for most of us the sun is shining, temperatures are heating up, and longer days allow for pursuits ...
When former BlackRock executive Salim Ramji takes the helm next month at Vanguard, the asset management behemoth's board of directors also will install its first-ever independent ...
Former BNY Mellon executive Joseph Keenan spent time during the pandemic learning "all things blockchain," knowledge that has come in handy since he was tapped in ...